Side by side · MY26 and MY24

LDV eDeliver 9vsMercedes-Benz eVito

280 km WLTP · 45 min 10–80%262 km WLTP · 35 min 10–80%
vs

The LDV eDeliver 9 is rated 280 km on the WLTP cycle, the Mercedes-Benz eVito 262. A 10–80% stop takes 45 minutes in the LDV eDeliver 9 and 35 in the Mercedes-Benz eVito. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.

At a glance

LDV eDeliver 9 · Van Mid Roof

280km WLTP

45min 10–80%

A$99,990from

Mercedes-Benz eVito · Panel Van

262km WLTP

35min 10–80%

A$72,930from

The short answer

The Mercedes-Benz eVito is the quicker car to charge.

1

The LDV eDeliver 9 is rated 280 km against 262 — 18 km, 7% further.

2

A 10–80% stop takes 35 minutes in the Mercedes-Benz eVito and 45 in the LDV eDeliver 9. On a 50 kW post it is 75 and 50 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.

3

The LDV eDeliver 9 lists 10,970 L of luggage space against 6,000 L.

Which one, in one line

Pick the LDV eDeliver 9 ifit wins on range (280 km against 262), space (10,970 L of boot against 6,000 L).

The priceThe Mercedes-Benz eVito is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$72,930; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.

MY26 · Van Mid RoofLDV eDeliver 9

LDV eDeliver 9

Van · 89 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
280km
Efficiency
—km/kWh
DC peak
80kW
Boot
10,970L
MY24 · Panel VanM

Mercedes-Benz eVito

Van · 60 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
262km
Efficiency
3.65km/kWh
DC peak
110kW
Boot
6,000L

Charging, raced

Two cars, one post, same clock

Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.

Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 83 kW for the LDV eDeliver 9, 72 kW for the Mercedes-Benz eVito. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.

Mercedes-Benz eVitoCCS235min
LDV eDeliver 9CCS245min

At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 45 min in the LDV eDeliver 9 and 35 min in the Mercedes-Benz eVito — a gap of 10 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.

Every figure

The numbers, with the badge attached

A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.

LDV eDeliver 9 and Mercedes-Benz eVito, badges as the catalogue lists them. Sources: the Australian vehicle catalogue for every row, the directory for the tariffs behind the running cost.
MeasureLDV eDeliver 9Mercedes-Benz eVito
Range and efficiency
WLTP range280 km✓MY26 Van Mid Roof262 kmMY24 Panel Van
Efficiency—3.65 km/kWh
Energy per 100 km—27.4 kWh
Battery89 kWh60 kWh
Charging
DC peak80 kW110 kW✓
10–80% at peak45 min35 min✓
Average power, 10–80%(derived)83 kW✓72 kW
AC maximum11 kW11 kW
Fast-charge plugCCS2CCS2
AC plugType 2Type 2
Size and weight
Length5,940 mm5,140 mm
Width2,062 mm1,928 mm
Height2,535 mm1,916 mm
Kerb weight2,930 kg2,318 kg
Space and practicality
Seats3✓2
Boot10,970 L✓6,000 L
Towing, braked1,500 kg—
Performance and warranty
Power150 kW✓85 kW
0–100 km/h11.0 s—
DriveFWDFWD
Battery warranty5yr 160,000km / 8yr 160,000km battery5yr unlimited km / 8yr 160,000km
Price
Starts atA$99,990list, before on-roadA$72,930✓list, before on-road
Dearest versionA$118,836A$110,770✓
Per km of WLTP rangeA$357.11/kmcheapest versionA$278.36/km✓cheapest version
Drive-awayA$122,500–A$128,000where the feed lists itA$76,000–A$80,500where the feed lists it

How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.

What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.

What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.

Your numbers

What this pair costs you, on your drive

Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.

The drive

Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.

LDV eDeliver 9
5

stops · 225 min charging

Mercedes-Benz eVito
5

stops · 175 min charging

The year

Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.

LDV eDeliver 9
—

no efficiency figure

Mercedes-Benz eVito
A$2,055

A$14 per 100 km

The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.

Your priorities

A verdict you can argue with

There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.

Weighted result

LDV eDeliver 9

wins 3 of 5 measures on these weights

LDV eDeliver 957%
Mercedes-Benz eVito43%

Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.

Questions

Short answers, then the reasoning

Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.

Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.

Which has more range, the LDV eDeliver 9 or the Mercedes-Benz eVito?

The LDV eDeliver 9. The LDV eDeliver 9 is rated 280 km and the Mercedes-Benz eVito 262, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY26 Van Mid Roof and MY24 Panel Van respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.

Which charges faster?

The Mercedes-Benz eVito. Going from 10% to 80% takes 45 minutes in the LDV eDeliver 9 (80 kW peak) and 35 in the Mercedes-Benz eVito (110 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.

Do they use the same plug?

Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.

Which has more space?

The LDV eDeliver 9: 10,970 L of luggage space against 6,000 L, and 3 seats against 2. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.

Which is cheaper to buy?

The Mercedes-Benz eVito is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$72,930 against A$99,990 for the LDV eDeliver 9 — A$27,060 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.

Other comparisons

All comparisons

Every figure on this page comes from the same records the LDV eDeliver 9 and Mercedes-Benz eVito pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.