Side by side · MY26 and MY23–MY24

Hyundai Kona ElectricvsKia Niro EV

505 km WLTP · 41 min 10–80%460 km WLTP · 45 min 10–80%
vs

The Hyundai Kona Electric is rated 505 km on the WLTP cycle, the Kia Niro EV 460. A 10–80% stop takes 41 minutes in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 45 in the Kia Niro EV. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.

At a glance

Hyundai Kona Electric · Extended Range

505km WLTP

41min 10–80%

A$46,000from

Kia Niro EV · S

460km WLTP

45min 10–80%

A$66,590from

The short answer

The Hyundai Kona Electric goes further on a charge.

1

The Hyundai Kona Electric is rated 505 km against 460 — 45 km, 10% further. It uses 14.7 kWh to cover 100 km where the Kia Niro EV needs 16.3.

2

A 10–80% stop takes 41 minutes in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 45 in the Kia Niro EV. On a 50 kW post it is 54 and 54 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.

3

The Hyundai Kona Electric is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$46,000 against A$66,590 for the Kia Niro EV — A$20,590 at the starting point, before on-road costs.

Which one, in one line

Pick the Hyundai Kona Electric ifit wins on range (505 km against 460), running cost (14.7 kWh per 100 km against 16.3), charging (41 minutes against 45).

The priceThe Hyundai Kona Electric is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$46,000; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.

MY26 · Extended RangeHyundai Kona Electric

Hyundai Kona Electric

SUV/Crossover · 64.8 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
505km
Efficiency
6.8km/kWh
DC peak
100kW
Boot
407L
MY23–MY24 · SKia Niro EV

Kia Niro EV

SUV/Crossover · 64.8 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
460km
Efficiency
6.13km/kWh
DC peak
72kW
Boot
475L

Charging, raced

Two cars, one post, same clock

Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.

Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 66 kW for the Hyundai Kona Electric, 60 kW for the Kia Niro EV. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.

Kia Niro EVCCS245min
Hyundai Kona ElectricCCS241min

At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 41 min in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 45 min in the Kia Niro EV — a gap of 4 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.

Every figure

The numbers, with the badge attached

A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.

Hyundai Kona Electric and Kia Niro EV, badges as the catalogue lists them. Sources: the Australian vehicle catalogue for every row, the directory for the tariffs behind the running cost.
MeasureHyundai Kona ElectricKia Niro EV
Range and efficiency
WLTP range505 km✓MY26 Extended Range460 kmMY23–MY24 S
Efficiency6.8 km/kWh✓6.13 km/kWh
Energy per 100 km14.7 kWh✓16.3 kWh
Battery64.8 kWh64.8 kWh
Charging
DC peak100 kW✓72 kW
10–80% at peak41 min✓45 min
Average power, 10–80%(derived)66 kW✓60 kW
AC maximum11 kW11 kW
Fast-charge plugCCS2CCS2
AC plugType 2Type 2
Size and weight
Length4,355 mm4,420 mm
Width1,825 mm1,825 mm
Height1,585 mm1,570 mm
Kerb weight1,760 kg1,757 kg
Space and practicality
Seats55
Boot407 L475 L✓
Performance and warranty
Power150 kW150 kW
0–100 km/h7.9 s7.8 s✓
DriveFWDFWD
Battery warranty5yr unlimited km / 8yr 160,000km7yr unlimited km / 7yr 150,000km
Price
Starts atA$46,000✓list, before on-roadA$66,590list, before on-road
Dearest versionA$60,000✓A$74,790
Per km of WLTP rangeA$91.09/km✓cheapest versionA$144.76/kmcheapest version
Drive-awayA$50,990–A$63,500where the feed lists itA$70,000–A$74,500where the feed lists it

How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.

What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.

What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.

Your numbers

What this pair costs you, on your drive

Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.

The drive

Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.

Hyundai Kona Electric
2

stops · 82 min charging

Kia Niro EV
3

stops · 135 min charging

The year

Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.

Hyundai Kona Electric
A$1,103

A$7 per 100 km

Kia Niro EV
A$1,223

A$8 per 100 km

The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.

Your priorities

A verdict you can argue with

There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.

Weighted result

Hyundai Kona Electric

wins 4 of 6 measures on these weights

Hyundai Kona Electric79%
Kia Niro EV21%

Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.

Questions

Short answers, then the reasoning

Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.

Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.

Which has more range, the Hyundai Kona Electric or the Kia Niro EV?

The Hyundai Kona Electric. The Hyundai Kona Electric is rated 505 km and the Kia Niro EV 460, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY26 Extended Range and MY23–MY24 S respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.

Which charges faster?

The Hyundai Kona Electric. Going from 10% to 80% takes 41 minutes in the Hyundai Kona Electric (100 kW peak) and 45 in the Kia Niro EV (72 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.

Do they use the same plug?

Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Hyundai Kona Electric, by about A$120.00 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 14.7 kWh per 100 km against 16.3. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.

Which has more space?

The Kia Niro EV: 407 L of luggage space against 475 L. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.

Which is cheaper to buy?

The Hyundai Kona Electric is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$46,000 against A$66,590 for the Kia Niro EV — A$20,590 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.

Other comparisons

All comparisons

Every figure on this page comes from the same records the Hyundai Kona Electric and Kia Niro EV pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.